China and Japan
The difference in reactions by the two East Asian countries stems from different reasons. Japans reaction can be attributed to its pragmatic leadership. The leadership in Japan had envisioned a free and independent country. As such, they wanted to learn the most early enough so as to progress at speeds similar to those of the Western countries. They thus took this incursion as an opportunity to learn fast. China, on the other hand, assumed that their superiority in the East Asian region could help them develop faster. This territorial superiority, however, was only real within its tributaries. As a result, China could not acquire new and more efficient technology and knowledge that were very important in the Industrial Revolution. The need by Chinese monarchies to protect their ill gotten wealth also fuelled this resistance. During the British Opium war, however, European powers managed to enter into China and thus the revolution got substantial impetus. The need by China to maintain a chokehold on their tributaries also fuelled the resistance to a large extent. Tributaries like Hong Kong had for long been oppressed by Chinese authorities who believed that Hong Kong was their protectorate and as such had to be governed from a central point. The incursion by Western imperialists was viewed as a threat as the western powers were likely to liberate these tributaries from Chinese oppression. In conclusion, Japan and China reacted in totally different ways to the Western Imperialism. This can be said to have affected the rate of development in the two countries. Whereas Japan progressed faster in the East Asia region, China and the other countries within the region were left to languish in stagnated growth. While we can attribute the Japanese reaction to a leadership with foresight, the Chinese reaction can largely be attributed to its largely very conservative nature fostered by its Confucianistic beliefs.
0 comments:
Post a Comment